- Nov 2, 2011
Wonderfully written, good to see you posting again Mick_Trick.
Seconded! I am keen to sample this, fingers crossed I like it better than some of their other recent stuff. Hope it isn't too sweet.
Wonderfully written, good to see you posting again Mick_Trick.
The bottle: mmm, less classy then we are used to.
The price: for heaven's sake. Every release is more and more expensive. This is stupid. A tacky bottle with a stupid name that costs that amount of money?
Smelling this now. Reminds me of Caron PuH's lavender and vanilla, with Dior Eau Noire's lmmortelle, but sickly sweet and synthetic. Smells like bubblegum. Sweeter than the women's. Pass!
I can appreciate different, but this to my nose was just plain bad. Then again in all fairness, I disliked ATOH and Eau Noire, not being a sweet, lavender or immortelle fan I suppose my dislike should come as no surprise here. It looks like Sunshine Man clicked with your tastes, and that is the only thing that matters at the end of the day.I like this one a lot - to my nose, it's the best new Amouage in a very long time. But then again, I seem to enjoy new sweet lavenders a lot more than most people around here. I remember the trashing Chanel's Jersey received around here when it just came out (God, it must still be shaking...), and there seems to be a lot of hate going around for Dior's Eau Noire (a close relative of Sunshine Man) and Kilian's A Taste of Heaven, as well. I like all of those a lot, and I'm sure there are many more examples.
I've noticed this for a while: the dominant consensus or taste regime around here seems to me surprisingly conservative when it comes to lavender - heaps of praise for nougeres and neoclassical lavenders like Invasion Barbare, Sartorial and 1725 (I found all three only very mildly interesting - yawn - and certainly backward-looking) and jubilant enthusiasm for the old Guerlains and turn-of-the-century classic fougeres. And it's not just here, it's all over the blogs, as well. But what about spicier/sweeter interpretations of lavender? Is it somehow sacrilegious NOT to treat lavender the way canonical others have done for ages? I'm beginning to wonder: Is it only Caron's Pour un Homme (which I love) that can get away with being both sweet and spicy without having to take a beating for it every time it's mentioned around here? Why? Is it because it's "old enough" to be OK, even if it's not really "traditional lavender"?
I may be mistaken, and I know we all have (and are totally entitled to) our different opinions - but what do you think? Am I the only one who is beginning to sense something like an almost automatic dismissal of "different" lavender scents in these and similar forums? That would be so boring, and I really hope I'm wrong.
Not impressed, but then I do not think much of this house in general.
I smelled this very briefly on a post it note...
Did anybody get like a brighter Eau Sauvage Parfum thing from Sunshine Men? It came off like a powdery citrus myrrh in the brief moment I smelled it.
Not I. I never thought I would say this, but the highly disappointing and annoying Eau Savage Parfum comes off smelling like a masterpiece in comparison to this enormous dud.
I don't know about this one. It is so weird that it makes it somehow interesting. Done some sampling and everytime I wear it my kids start whining they want ice cream:rolleyesold:
If retail price was in line with other Amouage Men, I wouldn't hesitate to buy this but with retail as high as it is, this keeps me thinking is it worth it..
I smelled this very briefly on a post it note...
Did anybody get like a brighter Eau Sauvage Parfum thing from Sunshine Men? It came off like a powdery citrus myrrh in the brief moment I smelled it.
catalogue your collection, keep track of your perfume wish-list, log your daily fragrance wears, review your latest finds, seek out long-lost scented loves, keep track of the latest perfume news, find your new favourite fragrance, and discuss perfume with like-minded people from all over the world...