Very pleasant, albeit kind of weird stuff. I m not terribly fond of eucalyptus and certainly don't wish to smell like a bag of mothballs, but Booster and Body Kouros are the chosen few that turn Strange into Lovely. If you added orange zest and fresh, green patchouli to this recipe it would be the most invigorating designer scent of all.
Horse basically attempts to recreate the scent of a barn without all the animal refuse, and to this extent I would say it is a success. Luca Turin once mentioned that hay absolute could be a fragrance of its own because it is so multifaceted. This notion puts it on par with sandalwood. The base has a bit of vintage English Leather to it but the top isn't nearly as bright, lacking the citrus and aldehydes. The clover is a nice touch, adding a sort of Springey,sticky and sweet texture which is very subtle. I am not usually one for oil-based scents but I would call this a winning combination. if you want to smell like Samuel Smith's famous oatmeal stout in a freshly-stocked paddock I have good news for you.
Samsara EDT as a shaving foam for men.
"But can men wear yellowy florals?" you ask.
I wear this, Samsara, and Xeryus, so I'd say there is no line to be drawn.
PS is basically a classic musk like Royall Muske or vintage Old Spice without the trademark bay leaf note, and smells to me the way forsythia looks. It's pretty charming.
Van Cleef and Hayman show you around their green lemon grove and adjacent lavender farm. The old trees on the property perimeter are old, twisted, and covered in moss. The lawn was just trimmed and the sunlight is filtering through the leaves of the grove. Perhaps you are sipping a Limoncello on ice. Good moods only.
I finally got around to trying this via a shipping accident and am glad I did. Maxim's is like the version of Hammam Bouquet that it's currently acceptable for a man to wear because, while quite floral and woody, it boldly and comfortably exudes a bit of 'lower body stink.' The civet Really makes this formulation pop for me in a Jules kind of way, in that it's a little gross or upsetting but all the more intriguing for it. The opening volley makes it out to be a powerhouse but it remembers its manners after a few minutes.
I am trying to discern the bitter, herbal scent in the top of Gatsby.It reminds me of the Laurel in JHL, or perhaps linden blossom or sage, or maybe even spoilage over time. All I can say for certain is the opening is an old fashioned (think '77-'83) sort of stodgy herbal-amber blend a la Wall Street which eventually fades into a mix of sandal and honey, which then lasts all day, like a space shuttle jettisoning it initial fuel reserve. Like Lauder for Men it's not going to smell contemporary but it will smell well built, well conceived, and will last quite a long time. For those of us holdout weirdos that actually enjoy the hybridized herbal-Orientals of yesteryear Gatsby is some certifiably good stuff.
With a base consisting mostly of vanilla, amber, benzoin, and tonka, PCpM smells like mossy, caramelized sugar. This was probably created just moments before the sweaty, animalic macho bombs came to take over the disco era and boy's club business end of the 80's. It doesn't smell dirty - just a tad burnt. If you dropped your orange creamsicle onto a green, smoldering shag carpet it would smell something like this. That being said, I quite like it, though it can become wearisome (especially if over-applied), as the aforementioned base is relentless.
My bottle is quite old, late 80's or early 90's as best I can tell. I can not recall what I felt when I sampled the current formula, as it was close to a decade ago at a mall Perfumania.
For historical purposes this is certainly a must-try, as it was an obvious and traceable influence on things to come (Looking at You, S.T. Dupont Signature).
This is the precise median of Chanel's Platinum Egoiste and vintage Safari. It is a sharp, bitter floral-herbal scent with a big leather base and a handsome dose of barbershop soapiness that smooths out into quite a beauty after the first phase. What a coincidence they all were released within a year and a half of each other. Every Aigner scent I have tried so far has been, for lack of a better word, a copy scent of something new but manages to smooth out the creases while somehow reducing the cost, and Statement is no exception. If you like soapy, spicy musks like Giorgio Red, Montana, and Royall Muske and the bitter-clean herbal scents from the early Nineties like Sud Est, Burberry for Men, XS, and the old Armani, this one is worth checking out, because it was well-built and fairly overlooked, so the aftermarket price isn't too bad.
This smells like 2/3 Escada Silver Light's fruit, laundry musk, and vanilla, and 1/3 Azzaro's Visit, especially the peppery notes. I like both of those blue boys and I like Samourai. We're breaking no new ground with this one but it's an easy reach for a lax, comfortable scent that's flexible as bamboo in terms of versatility.
Have you ever wished Xeryus Rouge had a Vanilla Edition? Neither have I. Eros Flame serves as a sort of poster child for the lack of available or fashionable base notes and what has filled the vacuum in the absence of anything of substance. It seems like most designer scents are relegated now to vanilla, tonka, Iso E Super, treemoss, fake vetiver, and 'woods.' As a result tonka is very big right now, but it's very limiting, in this case yawn-inducing, and this iteration of the Eros line adds nothing new to the discourse of scent, except that instead of just being 'safe' it pushes into 'offensive' territory with its cloying abuse of awful bases. To newcomers and club-goers and carefree teens I am sure this is an easy grab but scents like this are precisely why I own so many old ones. The kids may think I smell old but I think this just smells gross.
While I wish there was a bit more going on at the tail end of this fragrance (some patchouli would have helped the faceting, for instance), this remains a reliably happy rose scent, although I think the geranium is almost present enough to deserve dual-billing. Rose N'Roses will not surprise you but it probably won't let you down either.
Who the hell green-lit this? It smells as hollow and uninvolved as the Clean scents they sell at Sephora. If you were honestly (and I emphasize -honestly-) trying to sell me an emboldened take on the original, already strong, Eternity I would be sadistically curious. This has absolutely nothing to do with Eternity. It is not even a distant cousin. Nor is it intense, It is a bitter, smokey, two-dimensional affair which seems like it is trying to replicate fire smoke (effort, woodsmanship, and actual fire not included).
Maybe some will be into this but for my money it's downright gross in addition to being embarrassingly weak.
Calvin Klein's ever-expanding repertoire almost always involves roping the buyer in with the first few minutes with something exotic or uncommon and petering out at the base, perhaps hoping its buyership won't possess the attention span to care or notice for that long. They have made some great releases over the years, but every one since CK One has floundered at the tail end.
Eternity Air may as well be a Tommy Bahama fragrance, as it smells nearly identical to earlier explored waters. That being said it is refreshingly pleasant for what it is; a saline, ozonic lavender aquatic with a hint of seaweed. For those who like oceanic-fresh but feel that Kenzo is too challenging and Horizon is too old-school, I suppose. I can at least say it is potent without being screechy and smells gentler than most of the house's recent releases. Certainly nothing to write home about, but not really bad in any way.
I have no idea why this was released under the Eternity moniker, as it bears no resemblance whatever to the original or its other flankers. It is a candied, sweet mixed drink type of scent reminiscent of l'Artisan's Batucada with slightly better (albeit less natural-feeling) performance. I swear I smell a surprising hint of Szechuan pepper a la Opium PH, which adds a bit of depth. If you want to smell like a Tiki party at a Thai restaurant, be my guest. Not a scent to be taken too seriously, Now is fun and lighthearted, and frankly not terrible - just be sure to brush and floss after wearing.
By rights I should hate this, but I am a sad-sack sucker for boozy suede. I have become blue in the face from saying that CK's men's line would benefit immensely from more natural-smelling ingredients (CK Man could have been great)but then again it just wouldn't feel like 'them.'
If you, dear reader, can entertain and enjoy the idea of La Captive pear brandy spilled over a new and freshly-warmed pair of suede sneakers, then Reveal might be worth your time. Many will assuredly find it sickeningly sweet, some too synthetic, but I am too wasted on liqueur to care and my shoes know the way home.
CK's original foray into scent evokes (to my nose) fond memories of Houbigant's Raffinee, the original Nicole Miller, and Aramis 900, here meaning I am quite fond of its construction. It is mossy and ripe, strong yet versatile, and just plain good. This company dipped their toe in the waters by imitating classics and nailing it (see Calvin [Blue])and then went Calone-crazy instead of keeping a good thing going. While I do enjoy vintage Eternity, CK One, and a few others to some extent, it feels like after the flagship male and female scents and Obsession that the company tried to go either too abstract or too minimalist; It is understandable that the firm wanted to pioneer the future by divorcing themselves from the past, but I do wish their classical phase lasted just a bit longer.
Jules smells to me like an even mixture of Leonard Pour Homme, Gambler by Jovan, and Givenchy gentleman, in roughly a 3/2/1 parts ratio. So much spicy and indolic flower usage that, when paired with all that leather, smells of cinnamon. The basil and laurel together clearly state "made in the 80's". The galbanum and cumin play a round of "fresh cop, dirty cop." There is quite a lot going on, but it is a comparatively quiet scent with more of a come-hither vibe than a mating call. Sure, I wish it had a little more rev to its engine but the smell itself is enjoyable enough to forgive it.
Given the notes listed I was looking forward to something like Perry Ellis 360 Red or any of the other competent AdG clones, but what I got was a painfully banal and unforgivably weak 'bro' scent with no identifiably natural ingredients. Just glad I picked it up before the price spiked so I don't feel bad about giving it away.
A dark patchouli and honey combo with almost enough orris and tonka to make it smell like someone spiked your bottle of Giorgio For Men with a dash of old Royal Copenhagen. There is a delectable hint of licorice buried in the mix as well. I prefer this iteration to the original. Too bad it is practically non-existent now. One drop from a mini smells the equivalent of a full spray of most other designers out there.
DK Men would be a contender for my Pantheon of fragrances if the performance was better. But maybe that is the point;leave them wanting more. Like my much-beloved Minotaure it has an opening incomparably delicious, but dwindles quickly into a skin scent, though the base does ride out most of the day. The scent itself is mostly a chocolatey-suede with pineapple blushes, and the body lands squarely between the heavyhandedness of Animale Animale and the ephemeral lightness of Obsession Night. Before sampling it I was expecting something more along the lines of Viking by Royal Copenhagen, but that one leans harder into the fruit and floral musk.
Overall this is fantastic stuff. I couldn't imagine paying $300-500 a bottle at current market price for something with such middling performance, but I am certainly glad I got to try it before it disappeared.
It is like a Monet or Renoir painting of a motorcycle jacket, but for your nose - it obviously does not entirely resemble the thing itself, but the familiarity is undeniable, as is the quality. I will have to pay the reissue a visit.
This one is really something. Upon application the sharp, fresh profile of lavender and patchouli with such a dark back drop brings fond memories of Ungaro I, but the similarity doesn't last long. The soft and natural sandalwood and that tinge of rosewood take center stage not too long after, and the floral components are small facets on this gem. I suppose comparing this to the mean of Ungaro I and Zino Davidoff would make sense, though it is weaker than either. It is an excellent herbal wood scent but has none of the bombast or projection of most of its peers, but I kind of like that about it, because it is both close and natural. You'll mostly get soft woods and lavender with this one, but it's a winning combo for me.
With the lucky momentum of just having picked up a blind bottle of Tobacco Reserve I decided to gamble on Adventurer and lost. If you have ever wished Kenzo Pour Homme was less challenging or interesting, you're in luck. This stuff has seaweed but not enough to smell seaside. In fact, everything but the soft, safe musk is so light that (despite the pyramid of notes) it just ends up smelling like a weaker version of Set Sail Martinique or a much less characteristic version of Mustang Blue. It is not terrible for a warm weather scent, but it seems that every designer house now has to have one or two of these faceless aquatics in their stable and I am desperately tired of the format. At least it isn't saturated with cardamom.