Part of 'Les Echappées' collection.
Shams Oud fragrance notes
Head
- pepper, ginger
Heart
- saffron, vetiver, cypriol
Base
- tonka bean, birch, tolu, styrax , oud, labdanum
Where to buy
Latest Reviews of Shams Oud

Eventually, the spicy, smoky woods burn off, and all that's left is a generic, disappointing, but not quite off-putting sweetness. It outstays its welcome, and becomes tiring, making the nice part a sadly distant memory, but I want to stick with a thumbs up, however marginal, to recognize the good moments from earlier on, some of which were really nice, and had me thinking this is something I could buy in a full bottle and wear routinely.

After the initial spicy blast, it's noticeably sweet throughout its life, primarily due to the resins but also the tonka lend its signature sharp sweetness, and this group contrasts the oud and vetiver and keeps the whole blend in homeostasis.
It's sweet, woody, creamy, and slightly earthy. Pretty pleasant and unisex, though I figure this to be a cold weather fragrance more than a warm weather fragrance.
Shams Oud is a great performer, strong on projection and even better on longevity. At relatively standard pricing for the line of $250 for 75ml, though, it's surely in the category of one needing to love it in order to buy it. I do think I love it but am not sure I'm in need of that much juice for this fragrance in particular, which would fit in among an assortment of quasi-similar resinous cold-weather-ideal scents.
8 out of 10
ADVERTISEMENT

The opening is very sharp, resinous and spicy. I get the pepper,maybe some saffron and some type of resinous smell that is very sharp and dry. Although this facet is good, it is not my favorite part of this fragrance. About 3-4 hrs in, the pepper and saffron has taken a back seat. The smell has settled and it is no longer sharp and dry. It now becomes a comforting warm and embracing aroma that is probably the combination of the birch, oud and Tonka beans.
It has very good projection for the first 4hrs then it becomes and aura of beauty around you. It is more than a skin scent as it can be easily noticed from a short distance only to attract those near by closer in order to get a better sniff of this glorious scent.
I am 5 1/2 hrs into it and it is still on my skin easily noticed with the slightlest breeze of air.

I say this because I agree with Deadidol's review that Shams Oud is kind of static. It bothered me at first, but once I accepted the beauty of it, it's really grown on me.
So what does it smell like? I get a lot of that Australian sandalwood that smells kind of like coconut water, mixed with frankincense and topped with the smell of a freshly sharpened pencil and a burnt soot smell. It has a noticeably green sharpness which I assume is the vetiver everyone is talking about. It never gets medicinal or rubbery like the more challenging ouds. Instead, I think this is more for fans of Le Labo's Santal 33 or CDG's woody incense perfumes. It's also sweet enough to possibly win over fans of Creed's Royal Oud as well.

It starts forcefully with a blast of black pepper drowns out the resins, but soon after the balsam and the labdanum peek through. The oud accord is tricky to pull out as it's wrapped tight around the vetiver, and the two notes sit a little too close. The initial impression is one of earthy, dark tones – very resinous, smoky, and dry. It's pleasant enough, but frankly, quite unoriginal. Epic Man and La Fumee are doing something very similar to this.
Soon enough, Shams mellows out and the pitch drops down a few decibels. It becomes a tad more sweet, but overall, it maintains its labdanum / balsamic structure and doesn't really change that much. But that's true with many scents in this style because they're already dominated by notes that are commonly considered to be base materials (balsams, vetiver, cedar, labdanum etc), and what you get toward the beginning is probably going to resemble what's still on your skin ten hours later, which, for the most part, is the case with this one.
So, it's very tenacious and very durable, but very static. The problem I have with these kind of scents is that they're limited in what they can convey and they don't distinguish themselves very well from each other. The key is keep them from going too muddy, and shams just about manages that. The downside is that you really do feel like you're wearing a base in need of a perfume, so you have to resist the temptation to spray something over the top of it. Shams isn't that oudy, but it's dense and earthy. For it's genre it's fine, but it doesn't provide any new thrills.

6,5-7/10