PS fragrance notes
Head
- Sage, Lavender
Heart
- Armoise
Base
- Sandalwood, Patchouli, Myrhh, Musk, Vanilla
Where to buy
Latest Reviews of PS

I would imagine PS would have been an oddity in 1979, as that was the era of funky/animalistic, earthy, alpha male, hairy chest scents. This one is decidedly polished and genteel. I do get the comparison to Old Spice to an extent, but feel that Paul Sebastian has a lighter, cleaner, moral floral scent--on the barbershop side.
I would recommend this for ages 25+ for formal wear, nights out, and special occasions. I also think it could be great for weddings.

ADVERTISEMENT

The first whiff is refreshing when applied to freshly shaved skin. The invigorating spice accord is an exciting whiff of old-school energy. Then, the scent takes a turn towars the orient. The spicy rose, cloves and ylang ylang come to the forefront and are stationed there like soldiers, confidently attracting people's attention. Then, after all the delicious aromas are shared with everyone, you are left with a slightly sweet amber&vanilla and powdery musk, perfect for cuddling.
In fact, there is this initial blast of cleanliness like an old time barbershop shaving lotion, then resolved down to a very warm musky spicy little numer. Splash some on after your early morning shave on Saturday and start doing the yard work. In conclusion If you're someone who isn't particularly into fragrance, but like having a nice timeless smell that is fitting for all occasions, make it PS.


My review is for the current formulation from a splash bottle. Projection is pretty low but I got a good 4-5 hours of longevity.

"But can men wear yellowy florals?" you ask.
I wear this, Samsara, and Xeryus, so I'd say there is no line to be drawn.
PS is basically a classic musk like Royall Muske or vintage Old Spice without the trademark bay leaf note, and smells to me the way forsythia looks. It's pretty charming.

In a great American entrepreneur success story two guys from Jersey create and market a scent on their own and it works out.
I have deep love for Paul Sebastian Fine Cologne. Only Paco Rabanne sits ahead of this for me as far as the best the 1970s had to offer and qualifies as a must have for life in my wardrobe. Its composition presents as classic, not simply'vintage' and is less challenging for those worried about the risk of older frags smelling 'icky' or painfully 'dated'. Also it is absurdly affordable which makes PS one of the best values in all of perfumery.
So to summarize...
Warm, dry, powdery, spiced vanilla glow. Perfect.


For this amount of money, I'd expect some projection and longevity. But both are lacking, so neutral for me because of these points and the unoriginality.
Pleasant enough though, but not enough to overcome the neutral rating.

PS starts out powdery of vanilla and herbal of some sage initially with a vague warmth. This warmth becomes stronger up from a mixture of myrrh and ylang-ylang teased with amber and some patchouli. The sage sometimes blends with the patchouli creating an interesting herbal quality. Over the hours this scent breaks down to a musky powder state. Sniffing at the powder you get light hints of the spicy and herbal side.
This fragrance does have a pretty good longevity of 8 hours moderate projection and another 4 in low projection. Wake up the next morning and it's a skin scent.
Was the vintage formula of PS better?
It's debatable. On one hand the vintage was a mellow and powdery scent that wasn't as warm/spicy. It smelled good but no musky development and no ylang-ylang that I could detect..it was primitively blended. The current formula is better blended and spicier through going heavier on those notes. Both formulas smell good but also have their positive and negative aspects.

