Luciano Pavarotti fragrance notes
Head
- green ivy, bergamon, rum, sicilian lemons, neroli, petitgrain, verbena
Heart
- damask rose, cloves, patchouli, cedar iris
Base
- benzoin, opoponax, tonka bean, liatirix, vanilla, oakmoss, russian leather, honey
Where to buy
Latest Reviews of Luciano Pavarotti

At first I thought the atomizer was weak, but it actually works well if you apply brute force.
Visions of Pavarotti's fat ass singing in a tux made me assume this would be a talcum powder bomb. Thankfully it is not. It opens with dollops of honey and spicy citrus, which somehow remind me of a restrained Denim Original EDT. But that's where the similarities end because here it is followed by patchouli and oakmoss and it also gets powdery in the dry-down, but not much.
Longevity and projection are both moderate. Pavarotti For Men is an underrated classy scent. Such quality is highly unusual in a celebrity fragrance - the only other one I enjoy and own is Alain Delon Iquitos. It might be more suitable for formal occasions, but I don't care, heck I even wear it for work zoom calls when I want to feel professional.
Masculinity Level: JFK diligently working at his desk.

The opening is a fanfare of the most incredible amalgamation of citrus/green leaves, spice, and rose/geranium, with that undercurrent of all those rich base resins, opoponax, benzoin, etc, and just the right dose of patchouli to sheer it out. It swirls around my body in the most impressive, majestic way. I feel regal.
I'd like to thank my fellow fragheads for turning me on to this one. The buzz was well warranted.
ADVERTISEMENT

This is a tough one to crack, as Luciano Pavarotti is an extremely complex perfume with a gob of ingredients. I have heard comparisons to vintage compositions like Givenchy Gentleman and Giorgio for Men, along with more modern compositions like Dia Man, but honestly I don't get much comparison with any of them save for some similar ingredients used. If I were to attempt any kind of comparison, Luciano Pavarotti has a *passing* resemblance to the excellent, but rare vintage Bugatti Blue Bottle, but that doesn't come close to nailing the composition down fragrance profile-wise, instead being more of a starting point. The composition has a very dusty quality to it throughout, also coming off as powdery (from the significant oakmoss used that focuses near-solely on its powdery facet), but also warm woody, dry, slightly sweet, with dulled rose florals and relatively sanitized soft, dry honey infused patchouli throughout. Finally, a supporting leather facet that underpins the works is not quite suede, but more soft than rugged. It all comes together rather nicely with nothing appearing out of place, but the dust and powder do somewhat detract from the end result, especially to this power-averse writer. Make no mistake, I like Luciano Pavarotti plenty, but just can't quite get to "love." The bottom line is the long-since discontinued $90 per 75ml bottle on the aftermarket Luciano Pavarotti has an appealing dandy-like complex fragrance profile that for the most part hits the mark, only marred by its abundant focus on gentle dust and powder that keeps it from a higher rating and outright love, earning a "very good" 3.5 stars out of 5 and a solid recommendation to vintage perfume collectors who are not heavily powder-averse.

It's an oddly rustic scene for a cultural figure like Pavarotti, one that gives no sense of his life as a world famous opera singer. But perfume is a private thing; it's possible that the smell of ivy on a garden wall held something personal for the King of the High C's; a memory of the cottage his family moved to when he was eighteen perhaps?
But all speculation aside, as well as the disjunct between famous persona and private perfume there are issues with Pavarotti for Men.
The citrus and waxy floral notes that round out the 'garden' also give a liquid feel to the ivy and brick wall, but what results isn't really a balance of textures, more like a slick overlay of the dusty dry.
A crucial element of the perfume is the natural material Liatris absolute, described on creatingperfume.com as 'coumarin, hay-like and with a note of tobacco'. Evident right from the start, Liatris forms the spine of the structure. As the profile descends, the hay and tobacco elements fade away to leave the more durable coumarin - which is a base note. And so, because the structure is centred on a base note, the whole thing is pretty linear.
While the full set of modifiers are around, the effect is strangely unbalanced but still not too bad, skillful imbalance is one of the arts of perfumery after all. But the problem is, over time - as these modifiers drop away - the profile shrinks back to a bland and rather flat pale dusty odour. And because the perfume is slow moving and durable this latter stage goes on for a very long time - and it gets a bit boring.
So, if you aren't taken with Pavarotti right from the start - it's better avoided. All you can look forward to is less of the same.
[Aftershave]


This effortless, glimmering floral offers Guerlain/Nicolaï-grade refinement with 1990s dimension in its fresh and clean feeling. There's no animalic dimension (which can be found in distinguished predecessors like Amouage Gold Man, which offers more volume but not more sophistication), or any rough edges at all, really.
It's too well-blended for me to give a detailed note breakdown, but there's a light honeyed aspect to this that gives it its signature accord and distinguishes it from predecessors and successors.