Chypre Palatin 
MDCI (2012)

Average Rating:  27 User Reviews

Your ratings



Chypre Palatin by MDCI

Fragrance Overview Where to Buy Reviews Community Ownership

About Chypre Palatin by MDCI

People & Companies

Fragrance House

Chypre Palatin is a men's fragrance launched in 2012 by MDCI

Fragrance notes.

  1. Top Notes

  2. Heart Notes

  3. Base Notes

Reviews of Chypre Palatin by MDCI

There are 27 reviews of Chypre Palatin by MDCI.

One of the most beautiful modern amber chypres. Incredibly complex. And as a bonus, you don’t even have to wear it. You are safe to move past it if it challenges your gender norms(see below) or just plain don’t like the smell. Great on anyone.


Are you a man whose always wanted to smell like Chanel No. 5, but your grandmother scolds you when you reach for her bottle?

Well, your problems are OVER!

For the Extra Low, Low, Low price of only $300 per ounce, you too can smell like Grandma!!

I'm heading to the shower....

1.0/10, because there are no negative stars to select.

I hope this is discontinued, and the FeeBay market goes to $1k per ounce. Then, maybe Gucci Nobile will drop to $50 per 50ml where it used to be.

Tousled hair,sweat,naked raw sensuality. Chypre Palatin is an ode to the classical chypre fragrances of the past.not for the faint of heart or delicate of is an old school chypre fragrance with a dirty sex drenched aromatic chewyness that isn't frequently seen in contemporary screams quality.the perfume feels stylish and sure of itself.incredibly gorgeous.

A smooth oakmoss flanked by top-shelf leather,patchouli and balsam with minuscule touches of citrus and culinary herbs floating around.benzoin and amber are present,but highly civilized; many of the floral notes are there,but not prominent enough to isolate.the whole thing is big,round and undeniably impressive,but it's hard not to snicker at the kind of ever-the-top luxury it's signifying.the opening reminiscent of Guerlain's iconic exquisite brown-leather accord drenched in animalic castoreum and civet that gives the fragrance a very masculine edge.this is a fragrance best enjoyed in cooler weather's,especially in autumn.for all those who love chypre,is an immediate shoo-in on the test list.

Chypre Palatin plays that old school trick of great compression, each element pressed and concentrated like dried fruit, which then minute by minute opens up into a creation of great sensuality. While it has the complexity of bygone chypres, it can't quite achieve their bedrock mossiness, probably due to regulatory restrictions. This will only bother people who take their oak moss very seriously; the rest of us can just delight in this gorgeous creation which makes the best imaginary good old days come alive.
To remark on Chypre Palatin's three tier structure is to state the obvious – the candied citrus, herbal notes and spring florals up top, the heart of unctuous richness where floral notes are expressed as precious essences rather than with any verisimilitude to living blossoms, and, underlying it all, a base of shimmering resins, moss and vanilla-infused woods. It's the magic of their interplay that beguiles. The wearer feels bathed in things that are not mentioned in the pyramid at all – golden, radiant saffron, a hypnotic sweet animalic muskiness. And all the while those amazing florals – as though ascetics who had spent a lifetime in isolation learning the craft were distilling the most precious nectar in their single-minded pursuit – paired with the twinkling powdery, resinous base. This is where the garden of earthly delights interzones with zannat.

This is a very old-style chypre, unlike what most people who are fans of the genre are used to, which is perhaps why the response to Chypre Palatin by Parfums MDCI (2012) are so mixed. The other major reason, which is perhaps the greater of two elephants in the room, is the fact that perfumer Bertrand Duchaufour tries to make an honest-to-goodness turn-of-the-century chypre almost 100 years after its birth with ingredients that meet the then newly-minted IFRA restrictions of 2011. Ah, silly perfumers, don't you know that change is bad? Don't you realize that doing anything other than following a method once prescribed but now impossible is wrong, and if you can't recreate an experience to an exact degree using the same ingredients as before, that you shouldn't do it at all? Let's just stop making any new perfume and only hunt down vintage specimens made before an arbitrary cut-off until that supply inevitably dries up, then lay all perfume to rest as dead with a tombstone that reads "here lies an art form killed by the closed minds of those who refused adaptation". Sounds pretty extreme right? Well the reaction to most things labelled "chypre" from purists, folks often more vocal than the rest of us in a perfume world where oakmoss is the bogeyman, suggests that these modern interpretations are dead on arrival beyond artisanal perfumers that flip regulations the bird. This means that the usual answer is yes, they'd rather perfume houses not make chypres at all unless they make them exactly the way they "used to be", which hilariously excludes the oldest archetypes of the genre a la Chypre de Coty (1917) and its contemporaries. Chypre Palatin goes for this oldest form, with heavy animalics that makes this read more oriental than what most folks are used to in sharper, more fruity or floral chypres patterned after the later Guerlain Mitsouko (1919). I like the stuff, and outside the usual niche price grievances, I see no problem here.

The opening is very spicy and warm, with unusual notes of lavender sneaking into an otherwise orthodox start. The lavender mixes with the sweet citruses of clementine and aldehydes, which when mixed with the animal growl already evident from the start, reminds me a bit of Guerlain Jicky (1889). Galbanum and clary sage add a green aromatic feeling which pulls this a bit masculine initially, then the heart of iris and plum establishes a sweet powdery femininity which takes it back to unisex. Chypre Palatin is marketed masculine, but honestly is following the old "fallen women" trope of musky florals, patchouli, and oakmoss over resins and woods just like Estée Lauder Youth Dew (1953) and a host of others from the mid 20th century. Rose, hyacinth, jasmine, carnation, and gardenia are all blended into oblivion once the base shows up, which itself is a kitchen sink of animalics. You have styrax, benzoin, costus, amber, castoreum, civet, patchouli, vanilla, labdanum, and low-atranol oakmoss (which you can use more of than regular) doing the talking after the first hour or so, and they create a cacophony of spicy sweet green woody eminence. By the time things settle in, Chypre Palatin does smell like something an old fop or flapper would wear to the golden banquet to cut a rug with sweetheart they made googly eyes with the day before at the lunch counter, and that's what counts most. Wear time is going over the 12 hour mark so you better like it, and sillage is potent, even if distance projection isn't insane thanks to a dense composition style free from lighter or more-piercing top and base notes that radiate. The aldehydes are also pretty toned down, almost to a thud here in Chypre Palatin, emulating how they were used before stuff like Chanel No. 5 (1921) taught every perfumer that more was better. Best use is anytime anywhere because this stuff ain't ever going to be context-appropriate. One thing is for certain: this stuff will absolutely reek in the summer due to all the animalics and patchouli present, so make of that what you will when deciding to wear it in the dead of August if you live somewhere with considerable heat.

This is not sharp green galbanum bomb like a 70's chypre nor a rose patchouli exercise like an 80's chypre, and it certainly isn't in that strict bergamot over sandalwood and oakmoss trifecta which served to be a "man's chypre" from the late 40's to early 80's. Where does that leave us? Early efforts in the chypre field like the aforementioned Coty and Guerlain hold the key to understanding this one, as do later "floriental" styles (which are what these ur-chypres evolved into) like the erstwhile Estée Lauder or a few others such as Houbigant Chantilly (1941), Avon Occur! (1962), or Dior Poison (1985). What's funny about this is every one of these is marketed to women but can work on a man, while this fragrance here is a comparably modern niche interpretation marketed to men but can work well on women who favor this antique style, showcasing that the chypre all along has never truly known gender. How do I feel about this perfume? Well, most of the things I named can easily replace Chypre Palatin, and cost much less (at least for the moment from the date of this review being published), so as a good value this goes right out the window. Parfums MDCI were early forerunners in the whole "return to perfume as luxury" movement within the niche market, coming out the gate with pretentious market copy, packaging, and price tag to boot. Invasion Barbare/SB (2006) is like this, a modern-ish reworking of an antique style, also replaceable by several much-cheaper options, but in all Chypre Palatin feels accurate and faithful to its source inspirations. Whether or not you feel the price is justified by the accuracy and quality of the reproduction being presented I leave to the judgement of your nose, so sample first before diving in, especially if you're not 100% sold on older chypre styles made with modern materials. Thumbs up.

Amber, aldehydes and galbanum opening-green almond to start with, heavy creamy green with very light projection. The opening is the best part, very promising. However, the opening dries down very quickly to a semi-sweet-floral backdrop, heavy iris and light lavender mixes well with Chypre Palatin. It's finely crafted but very tame. After about ten minutes, you get the creaminess from aldehydes and vanilla and tonka. It becomes sweeter during the drydown. It's all very....average. Not challenging and not really in any way engaging. And it becomes a skin scent almost instantly, which is rather infuriating given the strong start.

What's more, this is very expensive: hundreds of dollars for 100 ML. Completely not worth it to me. This isn't a particularly masculine fragrance, I'm not sure why it isn't marketed as unisex.

I could give this a neutral, but really for the price: save your money. A very middling chypre with a very extravagant price-tag. For this much money, I expect something much more special.


Show more reviews of Chypre Palatin...

Add your review of Chypre Palatin

You need to be logged in to add a review.

Log in here, or register


in the Community

From the forums

Recently Viewed on this device

Whatever your taste in perfume, we've got you covered...

catalogue your collection, keep track of your perfume wish-list, log your daily fragrance wears, review your latest finds, seek out long-lost scented loves, keep track of the latest perfume news, find your new favourite fragrance, and discuss perfume with like-minded people from all over the world...