Chloé (original) 
Chloé (1974)


Average Rating:  33 User Reviews

Your ratings



Chloé (original) by Chloé

Fragrance Overview Where to Buy Reviews Community Ownership

About Chloé (original) by Chloé

People & Companies

Fragrance House
Karl Lagerfeld
Creative Director

Chloé (original) is a women's perfume launched in 1974 by Chloé

Fragrance notes.

  1. Top Notes

  2. Heart Notes

  3. Base Notes

Where to buy Chloé (original)

Some of the links we use are affiliate links, meaning if you click the links and make a purchase, we may receive a commission, which helps us keep the site running

Reviews of Chloé (original) by Chloé

There are 33 reviews of Chloé (original) by Chloé.

There are two versions of vintage Chloé; the original Parfums Lagerfeld and the inferior Parfums Chloé.
The Lagerfeld is lush and creamy, an aldehyde with fruity and spicy tuberose.
The Chloé is dry-woody green and sharp.
Avoid the Chloé and get the Lagerfeld. It made the Kaiser's name in the perfume world, yet the perfumer - Betty Busse - is still unknown to this day.

A kind basenoter sent me two versions of original Chloe parfum for comparison: one labelled " made in France", the other "blended in USA". I tried them separately first, starting with the French-made version:

This is a sweet, fruity, soapy white floral blend, with so many notes that it's hard to pick apart. lf pushed, l'd say the most prominent notes for me are lilac, tuberose & carnation, with hints of ylang & coconut lending it a slightly tropical air. The projection is initially quite powerful, & it could be cloying if overapplied, but after two hours it begins to soften. There's little development, although it takes on a more creamy-ambery tone as it dries down, & it lasts a good twelve hours before fading out.

Although it was launched in 1974, this one definitely says "80s" to me, & l do recall smelling it around that time, although l never tried it for myself. l'm not sure if or when l'd wear this as it might be overbearing to some, but it has a cheerful exuberance that makes me smile, & l think it'd work well in springtime as a mood-lifter to bring one out of the winter doldrums.

The US version has the words "essence imported from France, blended in USA" printed on the label, instead of "made in France":

This version seems much more soapy to me, & although aldehydes aren't listed, there's a definite whiff of "snuffed candle" about it. Perhaps because of this, or maybe a higher dose of galbanum, the florals take longer to become apparent, & seem less smooth & rounded to me. When the florals do appear, the tuberose is less dominant, & there's less of the fruity aspect here. lt also takes longer to soften, about four hours, & stays more soapy & clean with less of the creamy aspect in the base. The lasting power is similar though at around twelve hours.

l didn't expect to find much difference between the two versions, but l do wonder now if the formula was indeed adjusted for the US market, whether deliberately or not. l think l have a preference for the French version, & l think Mr teardrop would agree, as he expressed distaste for the US one, while the French version elicited no comment. That's as good as a compliment coming from him!

Trying the two versions side by side, the differences are in fact very subtle. The French version still smells more creamy & fruity to me, while the US version is more soapy. But for any vintage hunters out there, I'd say the differences are not so marked as to make it worth searching out one in preference to the other.

I've had the Lagerfeld version before. It was long ago. I don't remember how it smelled but, this is pretty and acceptable for my taste... Deep, dark, and heavy top notes. That is, as far deep as florals can go. The fruit is buried deep within. Honeysuckle, ylang ylang, and galbanum are the stand-out notes here on top. There is an almost boozy, cognac aspect.

The flowers in the heart are well-mixed. They are "dark" as well with no sugar thrown in for sweetness. They're raw. There is a rich, jammy-like-a-savory-jam vibe. Miss tuberose becomes dominate for the most part. Narcissus and carnation run a close second. This is an old-style floral with no modernity present. Tuberose continues its reign in to the base.

There is an addition of barnyard qualities, as a wet straw note and wet wood note appear. A light, wet earthiness comes into play. Musky, musk, too. I suppose one could wear this year round. I know I used to back in the late 80's - I didn't care about seasonal wearings then. This Chloe runs feminine without being overtly "girly".

A vague, mysterious, thick honey note appears on the skin hours later. It is almost "toasted" or browned somehow.

Very femme and floral.

My high school sweetheart wore Chloe in the 80s and I quite liked it.

This is a great feminine amber. It is about tuberose, but in the end, it smells like a floral-amber. Warm and a tiny bit sweet.

I love this fragrance. Apart from vintage Fracas it is the best Tuberose fragrance ever; nothing compares to it, nothing comes close. It is such a shame that it was discontinued.

It was my mother's favourite fragrance, so I may be a tad biased!

Show more reviews of Chloé (original)...

Add your review of Chloé (original)

You need to be logged in to add a review.

Log in here, or register


in the Community

From the forums

Recently Viewed on this device

Whatever your taste in perfume, we've got you covered...

catalogue your collection, keep track of your perfume wish-list, log your daily fragrance wears, review your latest finds, seek out long-lost scented loves, keep track of the latest perfume news, find your new favourite fragrance, and discuss perfume with like-minded people from all over the world...