- Nov 9, 2013
- 6,298
- 2,799
Tabac Blond EDC by Caron.
Surprisingly lovely to wear in today's scorcher in the Northwest.
Surprisingly lovely to wear in today's scorcher in the Northwest.
You are now able to log into the forums and post
I haven't had that image link/file issue on my end, desktop nor iPhone. However, the slowdown - yes.Is anyone else having a problem with image links in posts just showing up as image file names instead of the whole graphic image? Like this: TextString.jpg.
I can't tell if it's my browser's security settings freaking out over third-party image links, or if it's somehow related to the Basenotes server's massive slowdown problems (which has been even worse than usual yesterday and today).
Agree !the Basenotes server's massive slowdown problems (which has been even worse than usual yesterday and today).
Glad to see you wearing it so oft.Montana Parfum d'Homme
View attachment 334722
We're siblings, today !My #SOTD 🖤 🤍 🎹
(Just so nice; always puts a smile on my face; sprayed No.2.)
(Only 3.5 stars on BN; what's up with that?)
JAZZ
View attachment 334758
Without having tried the edp, I am affirmivative with the vintage edt being more complex. An early '90s Schiaparelli-Pikenz splash bottle is evocative of green leather and the difference from later versions is clearly notable in the base and late drydown, with great longevity and persistence. A travel spray from the same era, gives me a whiff of cumin and fresh B.O. My R.P. Denis bottle is more honeyed.Arrogance pour Homme EDP (original) (1982)
(Aaarrrghhh, this is beastly! It's just that much richer, darker, spicier and more animalic than the quite respectable 2000 reissue. The note listings reflect the greater diversity of ingredients between the older and newer versions with both castoreum and civet appearing in the base of the original and neither in the 2000 version. That doesn't mean they're not in there I suppose but I feel a flimsier base in the newer version. The opening of the original seems spicier and lists artemisia while that note is absent in the listing for the newer. Rose is also noticable and listed in the original but not the newer. Ultimately though both are quite serviceable, loaded with oakmoss and a rough and ready patchouli unlike any I've smelled though close to some.
Arrogance pour Homme in general is a spicy, leathery, animalic and smoky patchouli bomb no matter which version. I am curious (yellow)
to sample the original 1982 EDT at some point just to cover my bases. I'm sure it too is a beautiful beast!)
View attachment 334653
Love the composition of this photo. 👍🏻