GWM
Well-known member
- Nov 22, 2019
- 2,443
- 1,585
Wearing Moustache 1949 has been most pleasant today.
Continuing the travel with Vintage Concentree.
Whoah!
Here comes the Stink!
Big stinker.
You are now able to log into the forums and post
Wearing Moustache 1949 has been most pleasant today.
Continuing the travel with Vintage Concentree.
Whoah!
Here comes the Stink!
I also have the old tall bottles, which are a tad heavier on carnation and musk than this version, but all are nice.Built in the 80's huh?
I need to taste this.
Old Man Camel.
What a coincidence, I decided to give this one an outing myself today. I don't much care for the opening but I do like the drydown.I also have the old tall bottles, which are a tad heavier on carnation and musk than this version, but all are nice.
Lovely! I don't know when the switch happened from 'Para Hombre' to 'Pour Homme' but your bottle certainly looks like an early one from the 80's.Loewe para hombre/pour homme (1974?) by Loewe
Yes, it sure is!Lovely! I don't know when the switch happened from 'Para Hombre' to 'Pour Homme' but your bottle certainly looks like an early one from the 80's.
Perfume Intelligence shows 1982 as the year of its launch. Happen to own and love it also. Don't remember the exact year I got this, but it was in the 80s.Or Masculine by Bourjois (1976? 1982? 1985?)
(I've seen a variety of years suggested as the year of inception for this amazing unicorn. 1985 seems too late to me and 1976 is quite realistic but apparently there is no consensus. Hmm. It's been said that this is a precursor to 1986's Bel Ami and that is plausible to me as they are quite similar spicy, woody leathers. Perhaps the original 1966 Aramis is the grandaddy of them all? Whatever the heritage or lineage of Or Masculine it is a beautiful leather fragrance that is nearly impossible to find. If you do find one and you love Bel Ami or similar fragrances you'd do well to grab it!)
View attachment 337931